Based on 1 and 147 real audits
| Metric | Doxygen | Google AdSense | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 42 | Google AdSense |
| Accessibility | 88 | 84 | Doxygen |
| Best Practices | 62 | 85 | Google AdSense |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 60 | 63 | Google AdSense |
| TTFB | 158ms | 379ms | Doxygen |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Google AdSense outperforms Doxygen in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Doxygen leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Doxygen when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google AdSense when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Doxygen sites and 147 audited Google AdSense sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback