Based on 9 and 2691 real audits
| Metric | Drupal Multisite | HSTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 49 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 92 | 89 | Drupal Multisite |
| Best Practices | 89 | 88 | Drupal Multisite |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | HSTS |
| Security | 67 | 70 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 369ms | 374ms | Drupal Multisite |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Drupal Multisite in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Drupal Multisite leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.
Choose Drupal Multisite when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 9 audited Drupal Multisite sites and 2691 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback