| Metric | Drupal | USWDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 43 | USWDS |
| Accessibility | 92 | 95 | USWDS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 89 | USWDS |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 66 | USWDS |
| TTFB | 368ms | 540ms | Drupal |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | USWDS |
USWDS outperforms Drupal in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Drupal leads in TTFB.
Choose Drupal when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose USWDS when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 364 audited Drupal sites and 45 audited USWDS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback