Skip to content

Duda vs HTTP/3

Based on 2 and 1827 real audits

MetricDudaHTTP/3Winner
Performance6254Duda
Accessibility8889HTTP/3
Best Practices8489HTTP/3
SEO9291Duda
Security8072Duda
TTFB784ms324msHTTP/3
Composite8177Duda
Performance
Duda
62
HTTP/3
54
Accessibility
Duda
88
HTTP/3
89
Security
Duda
80
HTTP/3
72
SEO
Duda
92
HTTP/3
91
Composite
Duda
81
HTTP/3
77

Duda outperforms HTTP/3 in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 77). HTTP/3 leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Duda

Choose Duda when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HTTP/3

Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Duda sites and 1827 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Duda or HTTP/3?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Duda sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (62 vs 54 on average).
Which has better security, Duda or HTTP/3?
Duda sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 72 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Duda or HTTP/3?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HTTP/3 (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Duda or HTTP/3?
Duda sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Duda or HTTP/3?
HTTP/3 sites show lower Time to First Byte (324 ms vs 784 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Duda or HTTP/3 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Duda scores higher on overall composite score while Duda may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback