| Metric | Duel | PowerReviews | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 28 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 96 | 96 | Tie |
| SEO | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 71 | Tie |
| TTFB | 174ms | 174ms | Tie |
| Composite | 75 | 75 | Tie |
Duel and PowerReviews are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Duel has a composite score of 75 while PowerReviews scores 75.
Duel doesn't clearly lead PowerReviews in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
PowerReviews doesn't clearly lead Duel in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Duel sites and 1 audited PowerReviews sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback