Skip to content

Dynatrace RUM vs HSTS

Based on 12 and 2556 real audits

View Dynatrace RUM details | View HSTS details
MetricDynatrace RUMHSTSWinner
Performance3949HSTS
Accessibility9689Dynatrace RUM
Best Practices8688HSTS
SEO9591Dynatrace RUM
Security6570HSTS
TTFB486ms364msHSTS
Composite7375HSTS
Performance
Dynatrace RUM
39
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Dynatrace RUM
96
HSTS
89
Security
Dynatrace RUM
65
HSTS
70
SEO
Dynatrace RUM
95
HSTS
91
Composite
Dynatrace RUM
73
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Dynatrace RUM in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Dynatrace RUM leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Dynatrace RUM

Choose Dynatrace RUM when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 12 audited Dynatrace RUM sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Dynatrace RUM or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Dynatrace RUM or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Dynatrace RUM or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Dynatrace RUM (96 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Dynatrace RUM or HSTS?
Dynatrace RUM sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Dynatrace RUM or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 486 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Dynatrace RUM or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Dynatrace RUM may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback