Skip to content

Dynatrace vs Dynatrace RUM

Based on 26 and 12 real audits

View Dynatrace details | View Dynatrace RUM details
MetricDynatraceDynatrace RUMWinner
Performance3339Dynatrace RUM
Accessibility9496Dynatrace RUM
Best Practices8486Dynatrace RUM
SEO9295Dynatrace RUM
Security6665Dynatrace
TTFB363ms486msDynatrace
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Dynatrace
33
Dynatrace RUM
39
Accessibility
Dynatrace
94
Dynatrace RUM
96
Security
Dynatrace
66
Dynatrace RUM
65
SEO
Dynatrace
92
Dynatrace RUM
95
Composite
Dynatrace
73
Dynatrace RUM
73

Dynatrace RUM outperforms Dynatrace in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Dynatrace leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose Dynatrace

Choose Dynatrace when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Dynatrace RUM

Choose Dynatrace RUM when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 26 audited Dynatrace sites and 12 audited Dynatrace RUM sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Dynatrace or Dynatrace RUM?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Dynatrace RUM sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Dynatrace or Dynatrace RUM?
Dynatrace sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Dynatrace or Dynatrace RUM?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Dynatrace RUM (96 vs 94). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Dynatrace or Dynatrace RUM?
Dynatrace RUM sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Dynatrace or Dynatrace RUM?
Dynatrace sites show lower Time to First Byte (363 ms vs 486 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Dynatrace or Dynatrace RUM for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Dynatrace RUM scores higher on overall composite score while Dynatrace may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback