Skip to content

Dynatrace vs Google Analytics

Based on 29 and 2159 real audits

View Dynatrace details | View Google Analytics details
MetricDynatraceGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance3342Google Analytics
Accessibility9387Dynatrace
Best Practices8386Google Analytics
SEO9291Dynatrace
Security6766Dynatrace
TTFB346ms434msDynatrace
Composite7374Google Analytics
Performance
Dynatrace
33
Google Analytics
42
Accessibility
Dynatrace
93
Google Analytics
87
Security
Dynatrace
67
Google Analytics
66
SEO
Dynatrace
92
Google Analytics
91
Composite
Dynatrace
73
Google Analytics
74

Dynatrace outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Google Analytics leads in performance, best practices, composite score.

When to choose Dynatrace

Choose Dynatrace when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 29 audited Dynatrace sites and 2159 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Dynatrace or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Dynatrace or Google Analytics?
Dynatrace sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Dynatrace or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Dynatrace (93 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Dynatrace or Google Analytics?
Dynatrace sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Dynatrace or Google Analytics?
Dynatrace sites show lower Time to First Byte (346 ms vs 434 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Dynatrace or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Dynatrace may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback