Based on 1 and 667 real audits
| Metric | Easy Accordion | Facebook SDK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 17 | 33 | Facebook SDK |
| Accessibility | 91 | 88 | Easy Accordion |
| Best Practices | 92 | 79 | Easy Accordion |
| SEO | 85 | 91 | Facebook SDK |
| Security | 78 | 65 | Easy Accordion |
| TTFB | 1667ms | 422ms | Facebook SDK |
| Composite | 82 | 72 | Easy Accordion |
Easy Accordion outperforms Facebook SDK in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 72). Facebook SDK leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Easy Accordion when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Easy Accordion sites and 667 audited Facebook SDK sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback