Skip to content

Easy Pie Chart vs FitVids.JS

Based on 1 and 11 real audits

View Easy Pie Chart details | View FitVids.JS details
MetricEasy Pie ChartFitVids.JSWinner
Performance7047Easy Pie Chart
Accessibility7172FitVids.JS
Best Practices10087Easy Pie Chart
SEO10092Easy Pie Chart
Security7869Easy Pie Chart
TTFB1062ms520msFitVids.JS
Composite8476Easy Pie Chart
Performance
Easy Pie Chart
70
FitVids.JS
47
Accessibility
Easy Pie Chart
71
FitVids.JS
72
Security
Easy Pie Chart
78
FitVids.JS
69
SEO
Easy Pie Chart
100
FitVids.JS
92
Composite
Easy Pie Chart
84
FitVids.JS
76

Easy Pie Chart outperforms FitVids.JS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (84 vs 76). FitVids.JS leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Easy Pie Chart

Choose Easy Pie Chart when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose FitVids.JS

Choose FitVids.JS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Easy Pie Chart sites and 11 audited FitVids.JS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Easy Pie Chart or FitVids.JS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Easy Pie Chart sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (70 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Easy Pie Chart or FitVids.JS?
Easy Pie Chart sites score higher on security analysis (78 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Easy Pie Chart or FitVids.JS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor FitVids.JS (72 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Easy Pie Chart or FitVids.JS?
Easy Pie Chart sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Easy Pie Chart or FitVids.JS?
FitVids.JS sites show lower Time to First Byte (520 ms vs 1062 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Easy Pie Chart or FitVids.JS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Easy Pie Chart scores higher on overall composite score while Easy Pie Chart may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback