Based on 1 and 142 real audits
| Metric | Easy Pie Chart | Matomo Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 70 | 52 | Easy Pie Chart |
| Accessibility | 71 | 88 | Matomo Analytics |
| Best Practices | 100 | 89 | Easy Pie Chart |
| SEO | 100 | 91 | Easy Pie Chart |
| Security | 78 | 65 | Easy Pie Chart |
| TTFB | 1062ms | 425ms | Matomo Analytics |
| Composite | 84 | 74 | Easy Pie Chart |
Easy Pie Chart outperforms Matomo Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (84 vs 74). Matomo Analytics leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Easy Pie Chart when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Easy Pie Chart sites and 142 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback