Skip to content

Easy Pie Chart vs MediaElement.js

Based on 1 and 27 real audits

MetricEasy Pie ChartMediaElement.jsWinner
Performance7038Easy Pie Chart
Accessibility7183MediaElement.js
Best Practices10086Easy Pie Chart
SEO10089Easy Pie Chart
Security7866Easy Pie Chart
TTFB1062ms810msMediaElement.js
Composite8472Easy Pie Chart
Performance
Easy Pie Chart
70
MediaElement.js
38
Accessibility
Easy Pie Chart
71
MediaElement.js
83
Security
Easy Pie Chart
78
MediaElement.js
66
SEO
Easy Pie Chart
100
MediaElement.js
89
Composite
Easy Pie Chart
84
MediaElement.js
72

Easy Pie Chart outperforms MediaElement.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (84 vs 72). MediaElement.js leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Easy Pie Chart

Choose Easy Pie Chart when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose MediaElement.js

Choose MediaElement.js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Easy Pie Chart sites and 27 audited MediaElement.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Easy Pie Chart or MediaElement.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Easy Pie Chart sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (70 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Easy Pie Chart or MediaElement.js?
Easy Pie Chart sites score higher on security analysis (78 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Easy Pie Chart or MediaElement.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor MediaElement.js (83 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Easy Pie Chart or MediaElement.js?
Easy Pie Chart sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Easy Pie Chart or MediaElement.js?
MediaElement.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (810 ms vs 1062 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Easy Pie Chart or MediaElement.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Easy Pie Chart scores higher on overall composite score while Easy Pie Chart may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback