| Metric | EasyGift | Klaviyo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 30 | 28 | EasyGift |
| Accessibility | 79 | 87 | Klaviyo |
| Best Practices | 76 | 80 | Klaviyo |
| SEO | 94 | 91 | EasyGift |
| Security | 70 | 70 | Tie |
| TTFB | 398ms | 223ms | Klaviyo |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Klaviyo |
Klaviyo outperforms EasyGift in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). EasyGift leads in performance, SEO.
Choose EasyGift when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Klaviyo when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited EasyGift sites and 48 audited Klaviyo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback