| Metric | EditPlus | HubSpot | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 37 | HubSpot |
| Accessibility | 97 | 89 | EditPlus |
| Best Practices | 81 | 83 | HubSpot |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | EditPlus |
| Security | 60 | 65 | HubSpot |
| TTFB | 282ms | 288ms | EditPlus |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
EditPlus and HubSpot are closely matched, each leading in different categories. EditPlus has a composite score of 73 while HubSpot scores 73.
Choose EditPlus when your primary concern is accessibility and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HubSpot when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited EditPlus sites and 143 audited HubSpot sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback