Based on 1 and 98 real audits
| Metric | EditPlus | HubSpot Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 35 | HubSpot Analytics |
| Accessibility | 97 | 88 | EditPlus |
| Best Practices | 81 | 80 | EditPlus |
| SEO | 92 | 89 | EditPlus |
| Security | 60 | 65 | HubSpot Analytics |
| TTFB | 282ms | 304ms | EditPlus |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
EditPlus outperforms HubSpot Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). HubSpot Analytics leads in performance, security.
Choose EditPlus when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HubSpot Analytics when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited EditPlus sites and 98 audited HubSpot Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback