| Metric | ElasticPress | Nginx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 52 | Nginx |
| Accessibility | 89 | 86 | ElasticPress |
| Best Practices | 82 | 87 | Nginx |
| SEO | 94 | 91 | ElasticPress |
| Security | 63 | 67 | Nginx |
| TTFB | 373ms | 480ms | ElasticPress |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
ElasticPress and Nginx are closely matched, each leading in different categories. ElasticPress has a composite score of 74 while Nginx scores 74.
Choose ElasticPress when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Nginx when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited ElasticPress sites and 974 audited Nginx sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback