| Metric | Element | HTTP/3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 50 | HTTP/3 |
| Accessibility | 100 | 88 | Element |
| Best Practices | 92 | 88 | Element |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Element |
| Security | 76 | 68 | Element |
| TTFB | 71ms | 284ms | Element |
| Composite | 78 | 75 | Element |
Element outperforms HTTP/3 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). HTTP/3 leads in performance.
Choose Element when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Element sites and 1402 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback