| Metric | Elementor | Opal | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 26 | Elementor |
| Accessibility | 88 | 82 | Elementor |
| Best Practices | 88 | 96 | Opal |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 72 | Opal |
| TTFB | 890ms | 436ms | Opal |
| Composite | 77 | 73 | Elementor |
Elementor and Opal are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Elementor has a composite score of 77 while Opal scores 73.
Choose Elementor when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Opal when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 74 audited Elementor sites and 1 audited Opal sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback