Based on 1 and 1813 real audits
| Metric | ElementsKit | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 41 | ElementsKit |
| Accessibility | 85 | 87 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 96 | 85 | ElementsKit |
| SEO | 100 | 91 | ElementsKit |
| Security | 60 | 64 | Google Analytics |
| TTFB | 3143ms | 384ms | Google Analytics |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | ElementsKit |
ElementsKit outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Google Analytics leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.
Choose ElementsKit when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited ElementsKit sites and 1813 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback