Based on 2 and 1039 real audits
| Metric | Eleventy | Google Font API | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 64 | 44 | Eleventy |
| Accessibility | 97 | 87 | Eleventy |
| Best Practices | 88 | 86 | Eleventy |
| SEO | 100 | 91 | Eleventy |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 399ms | 410ms | Eleventy |
| Composite | 76 | 73 | Eleventy |
Eleventy outperforms Google Font API in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Google Font API leads in no categories.
Choose Eleventy when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Google Font API doesn't clearly lead Eleventy in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Eleventy sites and 1039 audited Google Font API sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback