Based on 5 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Elfsight | Optimization Detective | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 55 | Optimization Detective |
| Accessibility | 86 | 94 | Optimization Detective |
| Best Practices | 82 | 81 | Elfsight |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Optimization Detective |
| Security | 68 | 71 | Optimization Detective |
| TTFB | 1813ms | 4253ms | Elfsight |
| Composite | 73 | 77 | Optimization Detective |
Optimization Detective outperforms Elfsight in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Elfsight leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Elfsight when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Optimization Detective when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Elfsight sites and 2 audited Optimization Detective sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback