Skip to content

Elixir vs Erlang

Based on 12 and 14 real audits

View Elixir details | View Erlang details
MetricElixirErlangWinner
Performance7072Erlang
Accessibility9390Elixir
Best Practices9794Elixir
SEO8887Elixir
Security8180Elixir
TTFB1032ms923msErlang
Composite8483Elixir
Performance
Elixir
70
Erlang
72
Accessibility
Elixir
93
Erlang
90
Security
Elixir
81
Erlang
80
SEO
Elixir
88
Erlang
87
Composite
Elixir
84
Erlang
83

Elixir outperforms Erlang in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (84 vs 83). Erlang leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose Elixir

Choose Elixir when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Erlang

Choose Erlang when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 12 audited Elixir sites and 14 audited Erlang sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Elixir or Erlang?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Erlang sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (72 vs 70 on average).
Which has better security, Elixir or Erlang?
Elixir sites score higher on security analysis (81 vs 80 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Elixir or Erlang?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Elixir (93 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Elixir or Erlang?
Elixir sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (88 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Elixir or Erlang?
Erlang sites show lower Time to First Byte (923 ms vs 1032 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Elixir or Erlang for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Erlang scores higher on overall composite score while Elixir may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback