Skip to content

Emarsys vs Google Analytics

Based on 6 and 1905 real audits

View Emarsys details | View Google Analytics details
MetricEmarsysGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance3841Google Analytics
Accessibility8687Google Analytics
Best Practices8885Emarsys
SEO9391Emarsys
Security6464Tie
TTFB215ms401msEmarsys
Composite7173Google Analytics
Performance
Emarsys
38
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
Emarsys
86
Google Analytics
87
Security
Emarsys
64
Google Analytics
64
SEO
Emarsys
93
Google Analytics
91
Composite
Emarsys
71
Google Analytics
73

Emarsys and Google Analytics are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Emarsys has a composite score of 71 while Google Analytics scores 73.

When to choose Emarsys

Choose Emarsys when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 6 audited Emarsys sites and 1905 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Emarsys or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Emarsys or Google Analytics?
Emarsys sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Emarsys or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Emarsys or Google Analytics?
Emarsys sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Emarsys or Google Analytics?
Emarsys sites show lower Time to First Byte (215 ms vs 401 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Emarsys or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Emarsys may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback