Skip to content

Emarsys vs NewStore

Based on 7 and 1 real audits

MetricEmarsysNewStoreWinner
Performance3327Emarsys
Accessibility85100NewStore
Best Practices8696NewStore
SEO9492Emarsys
Security6660Emarsys
TTFB407ms88msNewStore
Composite7270Emarsys
Performance
Emarsys
33
NewStore
27
Accessibility
Emarsys
85
NewStore
100
Security
Emarsys
66
NewStore
60
SEO
Emarsys
94
NewStore
92
Composite
Emarsys
72
NewStore
70

Emarsys outperforms NewStore in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). NewStore leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Emarsys

Choose Emarsys when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose NewStore

Choose NewStore when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 7 audited Emarsys sites and 1 audited NewStore sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Emarsys or NewStore?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Emarsys sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (33 vs 27 on average).
Which has better security, Emarsys or NewStore?
Emarsys sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Emarsys or NewStore?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor NewStore (100 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Emarsys or NewStore?
Emarsys sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Emarsys or NewStore?
NewStore sites show lower Time to First Byte (88 ms vs 407 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Emarsys or NewStore for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Emarsys scores higher on overall composite score while Emarsys may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback