Based on 6 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Embed Optimizer | Optimization Detective | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 67 | 55 | Embed Optimizer |
| Accessibility | 88 | 94 | Optimization Detective |
| Best Practices | 85 | 81 | Embed Optimizer |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 71 | Tie |
| TTFB | 1789ms | 4253ms | Embed Optimizer |
| Composite | 79 | 77 | Embed Optimizer |
Embed Optimizer outperforms Optimization Detective in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 77). Optimization Detective leads in accessibility.
Choose Embed Optimizer when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Optimization Detective when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 6 audited Embed Optimizer sites and 2 audited Optimization Detective sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback