| Metric | Embedly | Webflow | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 38 | Embedly |
| Accessibility | 83 | 91 | Webflow |
| Best Practices | 85 | 84 | Embedly |
| SEO | 95 | 95 | Tie |
| Security | 68 | 69 | Webflow |
| TTFB | 266ms | 227ms | Webflow |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Webflow |
Webflow outperforms Embedly in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Embedly leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Embedly when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Webflow when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 6 audited Embedly sites and 50 audited Webflow sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback