Skip to content

Enquire.js vs HSTS

Based on 2 and 3294 real audits

View Enquire.js details | View HSTS details
MetricEnquire.jsHSTSWinner
Performance3953HSTS
Accessibility9990Enquire.js
Best Practices8489HSTS
SEO8792HSTS
Security6273HSTS
TTFB388ms403msEnquire.js
Composite7278HSTS
Performance
Enquire.js
39
HSTS
53
Accessibility
Enquire.js
99
HSTS
90
Security
Enquire.js
62
HSTS
73
SEO
Enquire.js
87
HSTS
92
Composite
Enquire.js
72
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms Enquire.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 72). Enquire.js leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Enquire.js

Choose Enquire.js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Enquire.js sites and 3294 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Enquire.js or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Enquire.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Enquire.js or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Enquire.js (99 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Enquire.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Enquire.js or HSTS?
Enquire.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (388 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Enquire.js or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Enquire.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback