Skip to content

Enquire.js vs HSTS

Based on 2 and 2599 real audits

View Enquire.js details | View HSTS details
MetricEnquire.jsHSTSWinner
Performance3948HSTS
Accessibility9989Enquire.js
Best Practices8488HSTS
SEO8791HSTS
Security6270HSTS
TTFB388ms365msHSTS
Composite7275HSTS
Performance
Enquire.js
39
HSTS
48
Accessibility
Enquire.js
99
HSTS
89
Security
Enquire.js
62
HSTS
70
SEO
Enquire.js
87
HSTS
91
Composite
Enquire.js
72
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Enquire.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Enquire.js leads in accessibility.

When to choose Enquire.js

Choose Enquire.js when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Enquire.js sites and 2599 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Enquire.js or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Enquire.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Enquire.js or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Enquire.js (99 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Enquire.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Enquire.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (365 ms vs 388 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Enquire.js or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Enquire.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback