Based on 17 and 3213 real audits
| Metric | Ensighten | Google Tag Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 42 | Google Tag Manager |
| Accessibility | 92 | 88 | Ensighten |
| Best Practices | 80 | 87 | Google Tag Manager |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Google Tag Manager |
| Security | 66 | 68 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 441ms | 443ms | Ensighten |
| Composite | 73 | 75 | Google Tag Manager |
Google Tag Manager outperforms Ensighten in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Ensighten leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Ensighten when your primary concern is accessibility and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 17 audited Ensighten sites and 3213 audited Google Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback