Skip to content

Ensighten vs Microsoft

Based on 16 and 2421 real audits

View Ensighten details | View Microsoft details
MetricEnsightenMicrosoftWinner
Performance2839Microsoft
Accessibility9289Ensighten
Best Practices8086Microsoft
SEO9189Ensighten
Security6566Microsoft
TTFB407ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Ensighten
28
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Ensighten
92
Microsoft
89
Security
Ensighten
65
Microsoft
66
SEO
Ensighten
91
Microsoft
89
Composite
Ensighten
72
Microsoft
72

Microsoft outperforms Ensighten in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Ensighten leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Ensighten

Choose Ensighten when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 16 audited Ensighten sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Ensighten or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Ensighten or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Ensighten or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Ensighten (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Ensighten or Microsoft?
Ensighten sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Ensighten or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 407 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Ensighten or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while Ensighten may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback