Skip to content

Erlang vs HSTS

Based on 14 and 2691 real audits

View Erlang details | View HSTS details
MetricErlangHSTSWinner
Performance7249Erlang
Accessibility9089Erlang
Best Practices9488Erlang
SEO8791HSTS
Security8070Erlang
TTFB923ms374msHSTS
Composite8375Erlang
Performance
Erlang
72
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Erlang
90
HSTS
89
Security
Erlang
80
HSTS
70
SEO
Erlang
87
HSTS
91
Composite
Erlang
83
HSTS
75

Erlang outperforms HSTS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 75). HSTS leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Erlang

Choose Erlang when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 14 audited Erlang sites and 2691 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Erlang or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Erlang sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (72 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, Erlang or HSTS?
Erlang sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Erlang or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Erlang (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Erlang or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Erlang or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (374 ms vs 923 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Erlang or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Erlang scores higher on overall composite score while Erlang may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback