Based on 2 and 1061 real audits
| Metric | Essential Blocks | PHP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 59 | 47 | Essential Blocks |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | PHP |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 66 | PHP |
| TTFB | 103ms | 430ms | Essential Blocks |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | Essential Blocks |
Essential Blocks outperforms PHP in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). PHP leads in accessibility, security.
Choose Essential Blocks when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose PHP when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Essential Blocks sites and 1061 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback