Based on 5 and 67 real audits
| Metric | EthicalAds | Plausible | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 79 | 57 | EthicalAds |
| Accessibility | 80 | 87 | Plausible |
| Best Practices | 96 | 92 | EthicalAds |
| SEO | 95 | 92 | EthicalAds |
| Security | 68 | 64 | EthicalAds |
| TTFB | 275ms | 217ms | Plausible |
| Composite | 80 | 75 | EthicalAds |
EthicalAds outperforms Plausible in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 75). Plausible leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose EthicalAds when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Plausible when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited EthicalAds sites and 67 audited Plausible sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback