Skip to content

EWWW Image Optimizer vs Google Tag Manager

Based on 5 and 2186 real audits

View EWWW Image Optimizer details | View Google Tag Manager details
MetricEWWW Image OptimizerGoogle Tag ManagerWinner
Performance5840EWWW Image Optimizer
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8086Google Tag Manager
SEO9091Google Tag Manager
Security6564EWWW Image Optimizer
TTFB252ms356msEWWW Image Optimizer
Composite7673EWWW Image Optimizer
Performance
EWWW Image Optimizer
58
Google Tag Manager
40
Accessibility
EWWW Image Optimizer
88
Google Tag Manager
88
Security
EWWW Image Optimizer
65
Google Tag Manager
64
SEO
EWWW Image Optimizer
90
Google Tag Manager
91
Composite
EWWW Image Optimizer
76
Google Tag Manager
73

EWWW Image Optimizer outperforms Google Tag Manager in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in best practices, SEO.

FAQ

Which is faster, EWWW Image Optimizer or Google Tag Manager?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, EWWW Image Optimizer sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, EWWW Image Optimizer or Google Tag Manager?
EWWW Image Optimizer sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Should I choose EWWW Image Optimizer or Google Tag Manager for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. EWWW Image Optimizer scores higher on performance while EWWW Image Optimizer may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback