Skip to content

ExoClick vs HTTP/3

Based on 1 and 1842 real audits

View ExoClick details | View HTTP/3 details
MetricExoClickHTTP/3Winner
Performance9453ExoClick
Accessibility9089ExoClick
Best Practices7389HTTP/3
SEO9291ExoClick
Security6772HTTP/3
TTFB202ms327msExoClick
Composite7477HTTP/3
Performance
ExoClick
94
HTTP/3
53
Accessibility
ExoClick
90
HTTP/3
89
Security
ExoClick
67
HTTP/3
72
SEO
ExoClick
92
HTTP/3
91
Composite
ExoClick
74
HTTP/3
77

ExoClick outperforms HTTP/3 in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 77). HTTP/3 leads in best practices, security, composite score.

When to choose ExoClick

Choose ExoClick when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HTTP/3

Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited ExoClick sites and 1842 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ExoClick or HTTP/3?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, ExoClick sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (94 vs 53 on average).
Which has better security, ExoClick or HTTP/3?
HTTP/3 sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ExoClick or HTTP/3?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor ExoClick (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ExoClick or HTTP/3?
ExoClick sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ExoClick or HTTP/3?
ExoClick sites show lower Time to First Byte (202 ms vs 327 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ExoClick or HTTP/3 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. ExoClick scores higher on overall composite score while ExoClick may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback