| Metric | Exponea | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 45 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 78 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 97 | 92 | Exponea |
| Security | 70 | 66 | Exponea |
| TTFB | 132ms | 365ms | Exponea |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Open Graph |
Exponea and Open Graph are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Exponea has a composite score of 72 while Open Graph scores 74.
Choose Exponea when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Exponea sites and 3416 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback