| Metric | Express | Node.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 46 | Node.js |
| Accessibility | 86 | 83 | Express |
| Best Practices | 85 | 86 | Node.js |
| SEO | 92 | 93 | Node.js |
| Security | 65 | 66 | Node.js |
| TTFB | 250ms | 327ms | Express |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Node.js |
Node.js outperforms Express in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Express leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Express when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Node.js when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 67 audited Express sites and 38 audited Node.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback