Skip to content

Extend vs Facebook

Based on 1 and 1417 real audits

View Extend details | View Facebook details
MetricExtendFacebookWinner
Performance2838Facebook
Accessibility7889Facebook
Best Practices7784Facebook
SEO10090Extend
Security6667Facebook
TTFB109ms280msExtend
Composite7473Extend
Performance
Extend
28
Facebook
38
Accessibility
Extend
78
Facebook
89
Security
Extend
66
Facebook
67
SEO
Extend
100
Facebook
90
Composite
Extend
74
Facebook
73

Facebook outperforms Extend in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Extend leads in SEO, TTFB, composite score.

When to choose Extend

Choose Extend when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Extend sites and 1417 audited Facebook sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Extend or Facebook?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Facebook sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Extend or Facebook?
Facebook sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Extend or Facebook?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook (89 vs 78). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Extend or Facebook?
Extend sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Extend or Facebook?
Extend sites show lower Time to First Byte (109 ms vs 280 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Extend or Facebook for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Facebook scores higher on overall composite score while Extend may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback