| Metric | ExtJS | Google Maps | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 0 | 40 | Google Maps |
| Accessibility | 46 | 86 | Google Maps |
| Best Practices | 73 | 90 | Google Maps |
| SEO | 91 | 93 | Google Maps |
| Security | 57 | 70 | Google Maps |
| TTFB | 145ms | 367ms | ExtJS |
| Composite | 66 | 74 | Google Maps |
Google Maps outperforms ExtJS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 66). ExtJS leads in TTFB.
Choose ExtJS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited ExtJS sites and 32 audited Google Maps sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback