Skip to content

Extole vs Microsoft

Based on 2 and 2444 real audits

View Extole details | View Microsoft details
MetricExtoleMicrosoftWinner
Performance2739Microsoft
Accessibility8689Microsoft
Best Practices8686Tie
SEO8889Microsoft
Security6567Microsoft
TTFB186ms329msExtole
Composite7473Extole
Performance
Extole
27
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Extole
86
Microsoft
89
Security
Extole
65
Microsoft
67
SEO
Extole
88
Microsoft
89
Composite
Extole
74
Microsoft
73

Microsoft outperforms Extole in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Extole leads in TTFB, composite score.

When to choose Extole

Choose Extole when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Extole sites and 2444 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Extole or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 27 on average).
Which has better security, Extole or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Extole or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Extole or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Extole or Microsoft?
Extole sites show lower Time to First Byte (186 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Extole or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while Extole may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback