Based on 2 and 251 real audits
| Metric | Extole | Microsoft Advertising | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 27 | 32 | Microsoft Advertising |
| Accessibility | 86 | 89 | Microsoft Advertising |
| Best Practices | 86 | 79 | Extole |
| SEO | 88 | 91 | Microsoft Advertising |
| Security | 65 | 66 | Microsoft Advertising |
| TTFB | 186ms | 316ms | Extole |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | Extole |
Microsoft Advertising outperforms Extole in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 74). Extole leads in best practices, TTFB, composite score.
Choose Extole when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Microsoft Advertising when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Extole sites and 251 audited Microsoft Advertising sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback