Skip to content

Ezoic vs FingerprintJS

Based on 2 and 37 real audits

View Ezoic details | View FingerprintJS details
MetricEzoicFingerprintJSWinner
Performance1829FingerprintJS
Accessibility8587FingerprintJS
Best Practices7979Tie
SEO8789FingerprintJS
Security5764FingerprintJS
TTFB311ms302msFingerprintJS
Composite6771FingerprintJS
Performance
Ezoic
18
FingerprintJS
29
Accessibility
Ezoic
85
FingerprintJS
87
Security
Ezoic
57
FingerprintJS
64
SEO
Ezoic
87
FingerprintJS
89
Composite
Ezoic
67
FingerprintJS
71

FingerprintJS outperforms Ezoic in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 67). Ezoic leads in no categories.

When to choose Ezoic

Ezoic doesn't clearly lead FingerprintJS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose FingerprintJS

Choose FingerprintJS when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Ezoic sites and 37 audited FingerprintJS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Ezoic or FingerprintJS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, FingerprintJS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (29 vs 18 on average).
Which has better security, Ezoic or FingerprintJS?
FingerprintJS sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 57 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Ezoic or FingerprintJS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor FingerprintJS (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Ezoic or FingerprintJS?
FingerprintJS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Ezoic or FingerprintJS?
FingerprintJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (302 ms vs 311 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Ezoic or FingerprintJS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. FingerprintJS scores higher on overall composite score while Ezoic may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback