Based on 92 and 636 real audits
| Metric | Facebook Login | Facebook SDK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 32 | Facebook Login |
| Accessibility | 85 | 88 | Facebook SDK |
| Best Practices | 84 | 79 | Facebook Login |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Facebook SDK |
| Security | 63 | 64 | Facebook SDK |
| TTFB | 460ms | 395ms | Facebook SDK |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Facebook SDK |
Facebook SDK outperforms Facebook Login in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Facebook Login leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Facebook Login when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 92 audited Facebook Login sites and 636 audited Facebook SDK sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback