Skip to content

Facebook Pixel vs Lucky Orange

Based on 640 and 3 real audits

View Facebook Pixel details | View Lucky Orange details
MetricFacebook PixelLucky OrangeWinner
Performance3333Tie
Accessibility8886Facebook Pixel
Best Practices7972Facebook Pixel
SEO9189Facebook Pixel
Security6677Lucky Orange
TTFB421ms214msLucky Orange
Composite7276Lucky Orange
Performance
Facebook Pixel
33
Lucky Orange
33
Accessibility
Facebook Pixel
88
Lucky Orange
86
Security
Facebook Pixel
66
Lucky Orange
77
SEO
Facebook Pixel
91
Lucky Orange
89
Composite
Facebook Pixel
72
Lucky Orange
76

Facebook Pixel and Lucky Orange are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Facebook Pixel has a composite score of 72 while Lucky Orange scores 76.

When to choose Facebook Pixel

Choose Facebook Pixel when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Lucky Orange

Choose Lucky Orange when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 640 audited Facebook Pixel sites and 3 audited Lucky Orange sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Facebook Pixel or Lucky Orange?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Facebook Pixel sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (33 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Facebook Pixel or Lucky Orange?
Lucky Orange sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Facebook Pixel or Lucky Orange?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook Pixel (88 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Facebook Pixel or Lucky Orange?
Facebook Pixel sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Facebook Pixel or Lucky Orange?
Lucky Orange sites show lower Time to First Byte (214 ms vs 421 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Facebook Pixel or Lucky Orange for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Facebook Pixel scores higher on overall composite score while Facebook Pixel may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback