Based on 680 and 8 real audits
| Metric | Facebook Pixel | Rakuten | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 19 | Facebook Pixel |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 80 | 81 | Rakuten |
| SEO | 92 | 86 | Facebook Pixel |
| Security | 66 | 68 | Rakuten |
| TTFB | 437ms | 240ms | Rakuten |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Facebook Pixel |
Facebook Pixel and Rakuten are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Facebook Pixel has a composite score of 73 while Rakuten scores 72.
Choose Facebook Pixel when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Rakuten when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 680 audited Facebook Pixel sites and 8 audited Rakuten sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback