Based on 612 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Facebook SDK | Mars Flag | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 11 | Facebook SDK |
| Accessibility | 88 | 92 | Mars Flag |
| Best Practices | 79 | 86 | Mars Flag |
| SEO | 91 | 100 | Mars Flag |
| Security | 64 | 60 | Facebook SDK |
| TTFB | 387ms | 942ms | Facebook SDK |
| Composite | 71 | 69 | Facebook SDK |
Facebook SDK outperforms Mars Flag in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 69). Mars Flag leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Mars Flag when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 612 audited Facebook SDK sites and 2 audited Mars Flag sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback