Based on 633 and 3358 real audits
| Metric | Facebook SDK | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 45 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 79 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 392ms | 358ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Facebook SDK in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Facebook SDK leads in no categories.
Facebook SDK doesn't clearly lead Open Graph in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 633 audited Facebook SDK sites and 3358 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback