| Metric | Facebook SDK | Sumo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 31 | Facebook SDK |
| Accessibility | 88 | 76 | Facebook SDK |
| Best Practices | 79 | 77 | Facebook SDK |
| SEO | 91 | 100 | Sumo |
| Security | 64 | 70 | Sumo |
| TTFB | 395ms | 488ms | Facebook SDK |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Sumo |
Facebook SDK outperforms Sumo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 74). Sumo leads in SEO, security, composite score.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Sumo when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 641 audited Facebook SDK sites and 1 audited Sumo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback