Based on 612 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Facebook SDK | Uptrends | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 37 | Uptrends |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | Uptrends |
| Best Practices | 79 | 88 | Uptrends |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | Facebook SDK |
| Security | 64 | 63 | Facebook SDK |
| TTFB | 387ms | 488ms | Facebook SDK |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Uptrends |
Uptrends outperforms Facebook SDK in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Facebook SDK leads in SEO, security, TTFB.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Uptrends when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 612 audited Facebook SDK sites and 2 audited Uptrends sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback