Based on 641 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Facebook SDK | Webflow Ecommerce | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 27 | Facebook SDK |
| Accessibility | 88 | 94 | Webflow Ecommerce |
| Best Practices | 79 | 73 | Facebook SDK |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Webflow Ecommerce |
| Security | 64 | 65 | Webflow Ecommerce |
| TTFB | 395ms | 73ms | Webflow Ecommerce |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | Facebook SDK |
Webflow Ecommerce outperforms Facebook SDK in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 72). Facebook SDK leads in performance, best practices, composite score.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Webflow Ecommerce when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 641 audited Facebook SDK sites and 1 audited Webflow Ecommerce sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback