Based on 650 and 4 real audits
| Metric | Facebook SDK | Webtrends | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 33 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | Webtrends |
| Best Practices | 79 | 80 | Webtrends |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Facebook SDK |
| Security | 65 | 64 | Facebook SDK |
| TTFB | 412ms | 260ms | Webtrends |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | Facebook SDK |
Facebook SDK and Webtrends are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Facebook SDK has a composite score of 72 while Webtrends scores 71.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Webtrends when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 650 audited Facebook SDK sites and 4 audited Webtrends sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback